Paine and his "common sense" (full text) _ pigeons can become Eagle

Classification: an international perspective, the starting point of the United States democracy: Paine and his "common sense" (full text) of the author: Qin Hin man 2010-12-27, the starting point of the United States democracy: Paine and his "common sense" (full text) Qin Hin: Thomas Paine said, "Patriot's responsibility is to protect the country against Government abuses!" he told us that the Government is the greatest scourge! this book of that year, as in the United States, almost manpower anthology. The difference is that the collection is Government action, the common law only ordinary writing. I wonder, when all the Chinese people are reading the Yang hengjun country in the world, China is not far away from democracy really. Thomas Paine said, "a King can do things that are merely provoke war and selling official posts and Peerage; candidly said, this is the country into poverty and conflict. One person per year reached million pounds, but also by people worship, is really a good sale pile! for society, while at the same time in God's eyes, an ordinary honest people than all the bad guys from antiquity to the coronation of more value. "Today our Government is not doing this business? Ma de-buywells fargo home equity loans ing and selling official is just the tip of the iceberg. From administrative to justice, from the Government to the army, is in the power markets keep buying and then sell it. Anger from netizens and ordinary people of everything, we already felt the smell of gunpowder. This is an unusual times, a doomed to let us stay-best of the 90s! like Yang Jun Li regret it, those walking in the Democratic front for the Warriors, will cast a democratic China's most brilliant light. Following sub article reprintDesk Help Software Tracking full text. ThomasPaine, (1737-29 January 1809, 8 June), British-born United States thinkers, writers and political activists, theoreticians, revolutionary, radical democrat. He was born in Norfolk, United Kingdom is the tailor, because his father was from a poor family, he attended secondary school. Youth worked as a teacher, a clerk, tax collectors, etc, by the threat of unemployment and hunger. 1765, Paine in the column, when the tax collectors is concerned about political 1772 wrote pamphlets the publicans event ", describing the United Kingdom tax collectors. In April 1774, he was a "anti-Government," thought was removed from Office. In October, Paine was as contractual nu came to the Americas. In Philadelphia as the Pennsylvania magazine editors. At that time, at the North American people against British struggle heats up, however, people's concept of the monarchy, and also entrenched Washington, Franklin, Adams the independence war famous politicians, are not explicitly put United States independence. In such circumstances, Paine published common sense "booklet. Open to United States question of independence. Brochure denounced evil hereditary monarchy: "in God's eyes, an ordinary honest people than all the bad guys from antiquity to the coronation of more value. "Paine this article, became independent in time of war the people of textbooks. Paine as United States independence war has helped, but as an outsider obscurity. Have been marginalized and combat, become unemployed. 1788 to return to the United Kingdom. Soon he wrote the praise of France revolution brochure "human rights", believes the storming of the Bastille, soil is "world event". This booklet has been banned, Paine was lived in France. He participated in the revolution, France France this revolution of intense and thoroughness, compared with the United States in the independenceHelp Desk Tracking Software war to profound, Paine thought behind, he was opposed to the execution of Louis XVI, the Jacobins ruling, Paine said: "the Republic was dead." Therefore, the public security Committee to "conspiracy against the Republic" arrested him, in the United States Ambassador to the intervention by Ambassador Monroe is released. 1802 year, Paine returned to the United States, in the silence of the 7 years after death. Biography * 1773 his dissatisfaction with the wage is too low, the State tax officials are dismissed. * 1774, he went to the United States Philadelphia, editor-in-Chief of the journal of Pennsylvania. * 1776 United States independent of unrest, he supported the United States independent of the colonial United Kingdom against the dictatorship, wrote his famous pamphlet "common sense", as in the United States from the United Kingdom colonial independent debate, criticism of the United Kingdom King brutal incompetent, that independent of the United States should set up after the Republic. His actively advocates the abolition of slavery, wrote the African slave trade in the Americas ", and Benjamin Franklin �� together abolished slavery in Pennsylvania. * In 1787 he settled in the United Kingdom, wrote some of the works on human rights, was wanted by the United Kingdom Government, * 1791 Paine went to France to support France revolution, were elected to the National Association, he considers the United States independent spirit affects France, but he was opposed to kill the King of France, supported the Girondins. * 1793 robes leading Jacobins won France's regime, Paine as opposed to their earlier terrorist dictatorship, as well as opposed to the death of the King's behavior, thrown into prison, written in prison by the age of reason. * 1794, France broke out hot, coup, the robes were beheaded, Paine was released from prison, is still serving in the National Association. * 1802, Paine returned because he has United States opposition to aristocracy and wealthy political and religious power, adhere to the nature of God on the United States was, in many people's criticism. * 1809 Paine to death in New York. Ideology Paine is a radical democracy and nature God, his "world citizens" to promote the establishment of a "world concept Republic", he also is a public education, raised the minimum wage limit. Ideology in Paine, the King and the nobility in does not exist, the people are equal. Impact Paine as "the common sense and greatly encouraged by the United States independent of morale, and some of his other works helped France, United Kingdom for the cause of democracy. Pan on the origin and purpose of the regime, and comment on the United Kingdom Government some authors put the community and the Government is confused, there is not much difference between them, or even no difference; in fact they are not only not the same thing, but have different origins. Society is our desire to produce, the Government is our evil; the first of our integrated concentric, thereby actively promote our happiness, which put an end to our evil, thereby eliminatingPolar enhance our happiness. One is to encourage exchanges and the other is to create differences. The previous one is a reward, a punishment behind. Society in various situations are welcome, but the Government, even in its best, but it is something inevitable evils; at its worst, became intolerable scourge; because, when we suffer, we suffer from a Government that is only in countries where no Government can suffer misfortune, as I personally provides the root cause of great suffering and deplored. The Government is like clothes, is subjected to cruelty innocence��but; imperial palaces of the characterization is built on the ruins of tingxie of paradise. If the stimulation of conscience is a stillborn Springs, consistent and keep their undying, alone without other legislators; but this is not the case, he felt the need to give up part of the property, money in exchange for the rest of protection; the principle of prudence in other occasions he two evils, now this principle also led him to do so.��������Therefore, since security is the Government's true intentions and purposes, it is without a doubt, may be inferred, it seems most likely to ensure that our secure form, as long as it is to spend at least benefit from maximum, all other things people are willing to accept it. In order to clear and accurate understanding of the Government's intentions and purposes, we assume that there are few people in the Earth of a certain part of the hidden remote, with the rest of the stay will not occur; they will represent any local or world's first settlers. In such a State of natural freedom, they will first think of the community. Thousand of motives will be encouraging them towards this goal. The power of one person alone to meet his needs, his mood and was never lonely, so he'll be forced to seek another person's help and comfort, and have the same requirements. Four or five individuals working together to build one in the wilderness, which still presentable residence, but a separate power of one person may work for life and nothing. When he cut the wood after he can't carry it, is to move the vertical up; at the same time, hunger will force him to leave work, each of these different needs in different ways to ordering about him.��������Diseases, even if it is an unfortunate, also means death; because they though and not taison, would make him cannot sustain life, to live the life and not death. This objective requires, as a kind of attraction, will put us in the composition of immigrants arrived, and our society from social life of happiness will be established, and as long as people always cross to be true, you do not need to have legal and Government constraints; however, since only God not as evil as the result of the infection, the inevitable occurrence that they had just overcome those in common cause they unite in the relocation of the difficulties encountered, immediately began to neglect their duties and their friendship.��������This action continues to demonstrate the need to establish some form of domination, to compensate for the shortcomings of morality. A tall trees will conveniently supply them an auditorium, the whole migration areas can in the shade of the party, to discuss common problems. Most likely, they first set of legal regulations is called, when in implemented up to public scorn as a violation of the regulations.��������In this first session, everyone naturally has the right to occupy a seat. However, with the development of migration areas, public concern has also increased, while members are probably far, inconveniences like before we all get together, and when their number is very close to the accommodation, public concern was few and trivial. This situation shows that they agree to elect from the members of some good people who specialize in managing legislative work, there is a convenient place; these people should be concerned about those who sent their people care about things, all practices with all members attend the same. If the immigration area continues to develop, it is necessary to expand the number of representatives to make migration areas of interests can be taken care of, but preferably to the entire region into appropriate sections, each section to send the appropriate number so that elect will never own an interest and the interests of the voter, and irrelevant to prudent, often holding elections is right: this way, the elected person likely in a few months back and then mixed with the masses, they would not dare to ask hard to eat them for the faithful that the public will be guaranteed.��������Because this kind of Exchange from time to time in conjunction with the community of each part of the establishment of common interest, each part will naturally mutual support, it is precisely for this reason (not based on imperial meaningless name), it produces the power of the Government and the governed. This is the origin and rise of Government; in other words, this is due to the weak and virtuous people need to take control of the world; from here you can see that the Government's intent and purpose, namely, freedom and security. Regardless of our eyes in the disputes before a trove of things so to confuse them, or how our ears deceived by sound, or biased view of how our will astray, or personal interest in how lost our senses, the nature and reason of Frank calls after all, would say that this is right. I am of the idea, from a principle cannot be conclusive of the nature, that is inferred, nothing more simple, it is less vulnerable to disturbance, even in the event of disturbance is also easier to correct; according to this principle, I want to say to the United Kingdom Government boasted. In formulating the United Kingdom Government's dark age of slaves, it was glorious, which I do not deny that. In the raging universal tyranny, try not to leave this form of Government, it is an honor. However, to justify this form of Government is not complete, not solid, not produce it should have the effect of, that's easy. Authoritarian (although this is a disgrace to the human nature) have the advantage they was simple, if people suffer distress, they know that their suffering is from who head the; also know there is no remedy; and a variety of reasons; the method of saving allMake them overwhelmed. But the complexity of the United Kingdom's system of Government, people may suffer for years and simply found out this is what fault; some people will say this, some people will say that every political doctor's prescriptions vary. I know that you want to conquer the areas or old prejudice is difficult, but if you look at our patience is part of United Kingdom Government, we will see that they are rhymed verses mixed with some new Republican factors of two ancient tyranny of dirty flea.��������First, by the King, as embodied in vestiges of monarchy tyranny.��������Second, by the House of Lords, as embodied in vestiges of the noble political tyranny.��������Third, the House of Commons, as embodied in the new Republic's constituents; and the United Kingdom's freedom is to the effectiveness of the House of Commons.��������The first two are hereditary, has nothing to do with the people; therefore, the rule of law, their country is no contribution of freedom.��������To say that United Kingdom's system of Government is one of the three forces, interrelated, and it was ridiculous; this is not a meaningless, that is nothing short of a contradiction.��������The so-called House of Commons is the King of a check, it contains two layers of meaning.��������First, if there is no supervision of the King cannot be trusted; or in other words, the desire to maintain the regime's desire is the monarchy of inherent disadvantages. Secondly, the appointment of members of the House of Commons rather than King worthy, it is more trustworthy. However, this same form was authorized in the House of Commons so that it can be used without consent of the State budget approach to contain King, later but authorized King that he has the right to veto the House of Commons in other motion as a way to contain House of Commons; thus it has such a meaning: King than it has been considered a King worthy of those people came wise. It's absurd! in the sovereign political system, there are some extremely ridiculous things; this system first make a person unable to obtain broad horizons, but also empowers him to solve those needs very wisely of judgement.��������National Jade's identity makes him ignorant things, but the King's posts, but he knows everything required; therefore these two different terms, because they are contrary to common sense and mutual hostility and damage proved that the person is absurd and useless. Some writers have this interpretation of the United Kingdom's system of Government: they say the King on the one hand, and the people are on the other hand; the House of Lords is the name of the King's House, the House of Commons, on behalf of the people's Assembly; but this explanation to Parliament all characteristics of separated and cannot be justified; even if the article is very pretty, but upon closer analysis, they appear to be unfounded and imprecision; but always happens: even the extremely particular about the type, if the description is not possible, or is a confusing and could not describe the things that can only be a bunch of loud, they are nice, but the lack of ideological content.��������The reason is that such an interpretation contains a preliminary question, that is to say, since King by virtue of powers is not afraid to trust people, and often had to pin down, so how could this King? such a power would be wise for people of any need to pin down power would not be where it comes from God; however, the provisions of the Constitution provides the power to exist.��������Constitutional provision will not be able to play the role it should; this means cannot and will not achieve the purpose, but the whole thing is a "suicide": because, since the heavy scales mound Association called up component of smaller things, since a machine of the wheels is represented by a wheel driving, we also need to know, is in the form of Government in which power is the most important, because that kind of power will play a dominant role: while other powers, or part of it, can hinder or so-called contain its operating speed, but as long as they are unable to make it stop, their efforts are wasted: the first power will do whatever they want, but it is not enough on the speed, you can get on in time.��������The King is the United Kingdom Government, the overwhelming part of it is not said, but he just because the position and allowance, for his entire forces, this also is self-evident; therefore, although we are smart, have made an autocratic monarchy under lock the door, but at the same time we are also very stupid, let King mastered key. United Kingdom to support their own by the King, the House of Lords and House of Commons dominated by the Government, this bias half come from rational, half the nation proud, even after the majority of constituents. In the United Kingdom, individuals undoubtedly better than in some other State security: but the King's will both in the United Kingdom or France are equally is the law of the country, the difference is that the United Kingdom King will not directly from his mouth, which is expressed by the Parliament Act of terrible form to people.��������Since the fate of Charles I just make more cunning Kings, not the more honest.��������Therefore, leaving aside all those in favour of the form and structure of national pride and prejudice, the truth is all too clear: United Kingdom King so not as oppressive as Turkey King, this is due to the quality of the people, not because of a system of Government. For the United Kingdom Government institutional aspects in the form of a discussion of error, it is necessary in the present; when we have some outstanding preferred impact, we must never be given to fair assessment, likewise, when we have received any stubborn prejudices of the time, we will not be able to make fair judge yourself. A man who is addicted prostitute does not match the selected or commentary on the wife, and likewise, any favour a corrupt form of prejudice will make us does not recognize a good system of Government. On monarchy and aristocracy in the universe of the system, the human race should be equal, this equality can only be used as a future destroyed by an accident: the difference between rich and poor is to be described, and in the instructions need not be applied when the oppression and greed, harsh, difficult words.��������Oppression is often the consequence of wealth, but rarely is or is not a get rich tools; although greed will enable a person who does not fall into extreme poverty, but in general it makes him become timid, not a fortune. However, there is aSpecies cannot truly natural or religious reasons to explain the greater difference that bring people into the "King" and "subjects" differences. Positive and negative differences are natural to make, good and evil is God made difference; but there is a class of persons born there, how high above for the rest, like a new person is so different, it is worth exploring, and understanding them is the promotion of human happiness still attracted means of human suffering. In the world of ancient society, according to the Bible on record, and no King; in this case the result is that the war was nothing; but now the human chaos, but of imperial arrogance. King of the Netherlands did not, in the last hundred years has any than European monarchy countries enjoy more peace ①.��������Ancient history you can confirm this assertion; because the initial batch of clan chiefs have been calm idyllic life itself has a fun, this kind of fun when we read the Jewish history of Royal will disappear. By the King's regime form was originally introduced by the heathen, and later Jews to imitated this practice. This is the devil in order to encourage the idolatry of most proud of. Pagan King of their death as sacred tribute to them, and the Christian world is going to the same attitude toward the living King. The sacred "Majesty" the title of the application itself and passing into the bones of bad people, is what a blasphemy! a person the status of the exalted above the rest, this approach from the nature of the principle of equal rights is unfounded or allusive to defend: because Gideon ② and Prophet Samuel ③ announced by the Lord's will clearly not in favour of the country of jade. In sovereign countries, the "Bible" on all opposition to the monarchy's section has been very cleverly disguise passed, but they undoubtedly worthy cause those pending Organization Government's national attention.��������Caesar's Caesar ④, is the Court quoted the Bible's teachings on, but it was not a monarchy, since there was no King of the Jews, were attached to the Romans. From Moses to record creation time, to require all the deception of Jews in a King of time only, almost three thousand years. In the King before their regime (Lord occasionally intervention in special cases) is a Republican form of Government, headed by a judge and the clan leader at the helm. They have no King, they considered that, in addition to the master of the men of the Lord, to recognize who enjoy the Kings of the title, but it is a sin.��������When a person is severely condemned people on Kings such as idolatry, he suspected, and it goes without saying, since always believed his glory is not in favour of the flagrant violation of God's system of government forms of privilege. Monarchy in the Bible as one of the evil of the Jews, and predicted that this evil will produce what kind of disaster.��������The event's history is noteworthy. Because Israel was the oppression of Midian, Gideon will lead a small army to attack, ① 1815 years previously, the Netherlands joined the Federal Republic, in which the dominance. -The translator ② see Testament �� judges ". -The translator ③ see Testament �� Isaac Muerji ". -The translator ④ see New Testament �� Gospel ". -The translator was God's victory in the participation. Jews prevail after very glad that this is a bold vision of Gideon, it is therefore proposed to push him as King, said: I wish you and your grandchildren manage us. This is a most impressive temptation; not merely a throne, but was a descent of the throne; but Gideon heart devoutly answered and said, I do not manage to you, my son does not manage you. Only the Lord over you.��������Words can not say more clearly; Gideon is not rejection of such honor, but to deny they have given him the honor of rights; he did not himself out of a courtesy thank them, but certainly the tone of the Prophet blame them not betraying their own monarch, i.e. God. In this matter after, after about thirty years, they made the same mistake again. Jews want to mimic the pagan custom of idolatry is simply a desire to unspeakable; as a result, they caught the Samuel is responsible for the management of temporal affairs of the two sons of misconduct, noisy and hurried to the immediate withdrawal of Samuel said, you are old and your sons do your road, now please give us a King we, like the Nations. Here, we say that their motivation is bad, that is, they want to, like other countries, like the heathen, and they truly glorious it is to not like them as much as possible. Samuel does not delight in and they said, we stand a King; and he prayed to the Lord. And the Lord said to Samuel, people say to you all the words, but you do not comply, because they are tired of you, but tired of me, not me as their King. Since I brought them out of Egypt to nowadays, they often leave me, and serve other gods, and now they do to you, according to their practices. So you want to follow them, just when the alert them, tell them how future that King over them. That is, not any particular King's way, but Israel people anxious to imitated by all the King's usage of the world. Now, although it's already at far, practices vary greatly, but nature still has not changed, Samuel will of the Lord, to ask him a King of the people, over your King will do. He will send your son to his cattle, horses, campaigned in front (this description of the co-occurrence of serving the strongman of consistent). And send them to the Commander, 50, as he cultivated land, crops, weapons and vehicles. He will take your daughters to make perfume, cooking scones (these words describe the King's luxury, waste and coercion). It will take your best fields, vineyards, olive groves, gave his servants.Your food and the vineyard, it will take a tenth, to his great prison and his attendants (from here we can see that the bribery, corruption and favouritism but Kings of consistent bad style). It will take your menservants, robust young person and your ass for his attendants. Your flocks he will take a tenth, you also will be his servant. Then you will have chosen the King cried out to the Lord, the Lord will not answer you. This illustrates the monarchy continues; very few of the good King since the ancient times of moral character, and neither the name become legitimate things cannot blot out the sins of originally produced the King; the Bible quite a lot of David, is not that he posts a King, but only because he is a person to meet God. However people should not listen to Samuel, said: Nay, we want a King to make us like the Nations, a King to lead us, we, as we fight. Samuel continues to educate them, but to no avail; he pointed out that their ungrateful, but all in vain; when he saw that they insisted, he cried: my Lord, he will thunder rain (because at that time it had entered the season, this is a form of punishment), so that you know and see that you ask a King, the Lord has committed crimes. Then withdraw and Samuel Lord, the Lord in that day Thunder rain, people would have to fear the Lord and Samuel. All the people said to Samuel, I beg you to pray for the servants of the Lord your God, lest we died, because we seek a King, is sin and sin. These parts of the Bible is clear and definite. They should not have any ambiguous interpretation. To end a God did here to protest against the monarchy, to last is the "Bible" is forged. We have every reason to believe that believe in Catholic countries, King and priest is craft, trying not to let people know about these Scriptures. Because of the monarchy, without exception, is the political system of the Catholic Church. In addition to the monarchy of evils, as well as hereditary evils; monarchy means that our own downfall of the fallen and, similarly, be deemed to have rights to compete for the descent, is an insult to our children and grandchildren and spoofing. Because, now that all men are equal, then no one is entitled to due to the origin of the creation of a permanent than other households accounted for superior status of families, and, although he himself might be worth the contemporaries of the considerable degree of respect for his father but may certainly not worthy of heiress this honor.��������There is a very strong visible evidence sufficient to demonstrate the patrimonial right King is absurd, that is, God does not favour this approach, otherwise it would not have often ass and not to give human male lion, which makes a mockery of the system. Second, a person can only maintain people initially granted to him by the society honors the Similarly, those who honor the grantee also has no power to sacrifice children's rights; although they can say "we push you to be our King," they can't say "your children and your children and grandchildren can never dominate our children and our children and grandchildren," but does not infringe the rights of his own father. The reason is that such a foolish, unfair, unreasonable favors of about Hsu, probably in the next dynasty makes them a villain or a fool.��������Most wise of personal emotional always keeps the scornful attitude toward the right of hereditary; however this is that, once established, it's not easy to wipe out one of the disadvantages of; many people fear and obedience and others due to superstition and obedience, part of the more powerful the bangtong King on others for plunder. It is generally believed that the man in the world and a group of King has a glorious history: while most likely reality is that if we can pull off the ancient hidden hide, dating back to the root of their success, we will find that their ancestor is just one of the partners cannot be of the Lord of evil, his cruel acts or famous devious won him the title of the band leader: increase due to the forces and the looting of the expansion of the range, he intimidated the unarmed goodness people, so much they often contribute to the property in return for their safety. But those who elected him would never think to hereditary right to his descendants, because they never give up that their rights are and what they say, life is to follow the informality of the reservations that are incompatible with the principle of freedom. Therefore, at the beginning of a hereditary monarchy, only as a temporary or supplement, and not as a logical system to implement: but, since that time almost no stay or no leave records, oral history and legend is filled with a fictitious story, so after a few generations later, it is easy to fabricate a set that can easily spread, like on the legend of pagan ancestor, superstition, like stuff, and again Forte sensitize hereditary rights concept.��������Perhaps, in the Princes's death and to elect a new leader, disturbances of the situation (because the election is in the middle of the criminals will not be very orderly) makes many people feel that the panic alarm, or seem to induce their first in favour of hereditary claims; therefore, so what happens after that, it was initially believed that it's a work-around, but in the future that is a right. Since the Duke of Normandy, the United Kingdom since the conquest of the United Kingdom has a few good monarch, but it has much in size many tyrants of dominated the painful groans under issue: no rational person, never said they were William I's reign can enjoy rights are very honorable. One of France's wild bastard with a team of armed bandits landing, contrary to the will of the local population and self-reliance as King of England, we can "he said this man's origin is menial of ��. This, of course, there is no divine means. However we do not have to spend a lot of time to expose the hereditary right absurd; if anyone mind stupid, believe this, then let them not indiscriminate worship ass and male lion, and welcomed. I can neither imitate their descendants, nor interfere with their faith. But I'm glad, they think that what was originally the King? this problem can only have three answers, that is, or by drawing lots, or by election, or byUsurpation. If the first King by drawing lots, which is the next King make precedents, not hereditary. Saul ② by drawing lots lap is King, but the throne of hereditary succession is not, and that affair lasted, we also do not see any sign intended to hereditary. If a country's first King was elected, that's the same for the next make precedents; if the first group of voters elect a King not only, and the election of a hereditary royalty, thereby abandoning all rights of future generations, in addition to human free will is in the hand of Adam the doctrine of original sin, searched the Bible out of the same example; according to this comparison, but it is not possible according to other controlled, handed down system is not a glorious conclusion. Reflected in Adam of everyone sinned, embodied in the first group of voters is everyone listening to; are reflected in the former is mankind are subject to the mercy of Satan, as represented by the latter are subject to the sovereignty of human domination; because the former we lost the pure, since the latter we lose sovereignty; since both sides that we cannot recover the status and privileges of some sort, we undoubtedly can infer, original sin and hereditary is similar. What a disgrace tie! how disgraceful contact! but the most astute orator, I couldn't be more appropriate analogy. When it comes to usurp that no one would dare to act on behalf of the defence; William I was usurped by, this is undeniable.��������As plain as the nose, the origins of the United Kingdom monarchy will not withstand careful inspection. However, and human-related hereditary-absurd, but also far behind its more serious hazards. If this system guaranteed to provide a group of kind and wise person, it would also may be considered for the licence of the theocratic, but in fact it is only to the fool, the wicked and nasty people open the door, so it is with the nature of suffering. Those who are regarded as born ruler and apparent who is born to slaves, soon tyranny.��������Because they are from the rest of the selected from among human beings, their psychological had poisoned by the arrogant; in its activities, and General of the world there are significant differences, so they simply do not have the opportunity to understand the general interests of the real world, when they inherit a regime, often within the whole territory of things still do not know, not worthy to be addressed. With the descent of the scourge of another is that the throne at the age of either for an underage person possession; in that period to cover and Regency King who has everything for the opportunity and motivation to betray the abandoned people trust in him. When a King of old age, step one human infirmity of the end of time, also occur with the same unfortunate.��������In both cases, people become diverse villain in the hands of the victim, because these people can successfully play the old age and an infant posed by foolish behavior. Favour of patrimonial system has made it seems most justified the excuse is that it does not preserve the State of civil war occurred; if this is correct, that was very profound; but in fact it is to deceive mankind has the most shameless lies. The entire history of the United Kingdom also denied this fact. From 1066 years, thirty-three kings and two young King ruled the Kingdom of this confusion, during this period, there is at least eight civil war and nineteenth meeting of the rebellion (Revolution).��������It does not contribute to peace, and is not conducive to peace, and undermines the foundations on which it depends. William t United Kingdom ① (in bit's 1066-1087) was born in Normandy. He in Hastings ' battle brutally suppressed the revolt of the inhabitants, in 1066, invaded large following top borders. -The translator ② Israel's first King, see the Testament �� Isaac Muerji on law. -The translator's Royal family and Royal family, Lancaster, York between competing for monarchical and inheritance of struggle, the United Kingdom many years becoming a bloody battlefield ①. Henry and Edward played 12 times a fierce battle, encounters and excluding siege. Henry twice did Edward's prison cell, Edward also gave Henry capture before. When a quarrel just due to personal problems, the fate of the war and dislikes very unpredictable, so Henry was sent back to the Royal Palace from the prison, and Edward is forced to flee from the Royal Palace in foreign countries; however, because the sudden change of likes and dislikes, unsustainable and Henry-the throne, recall under Edward to succession.��������Parliament always backward force most powerful side. This struggle from Henry VI in power, to the unity of the Royal family of the hands of Henry VII has not completely stopped.��������This period including the 1978 from 1422 year to year ② 1489. In short, the monarchy and patrimonial system not only makes a Kingdom and make the entire world into a pool of blood and rubble. This is the Bible against regime forms, so you have to bloodshed. If we look at the work done by the King, we find that in some countries they can say what is not dry; in mixed over on its own is not fun, is not good for the country's life later, they withdrew from the stage, so that subsequent to follow the same dream. In autocratic monarchy countries: civil and military of heavily burdens placed King herself; Israel people asked when a King had made an "a King to lead us, we, as we battle".��������But as in the United Kingdom so that the King is neither judges nor the Marshal, really make it difficult to understand what he is doing. Any form of closer Republican, you need to do the work of the King. To give the United Kingdom Government to an appropriate name, somewhat difficult. William �� Meredith Knight calls it Republic; but in its current state, it is not deserve this name because the King as the right to any arrangement for all official corruption forces caused by the virtually dominated regime, the House of Commons (Government of the Republic), resulting in the United Kingdom's system of Government is almost like France or Spain, purely monarchy. People if you do not know the name of the trueMeaning, must not be easily agree. People who take pride in the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom is not part of the monarch, and is part of the Republic, that is, from their own group of elected MPs of the kind of freedom �� and we can easily see when Republican failure folow the of slavery.��������United Kingdom Government is defective, only because Locke has poisoned the Republican; King has monopolized the House of Commons. In the United Kingdom, a King can do things that are merely provoke war and selling official posts and Peerage; candidly said, this is the country into poverty and conflict.��������One person per year reached million pounds, but also by people worship, is really a good sale pile! for society, while at the same time in God's eyes, an ordinary honest people than all the bad guys from antiquity to the coronation of more value. �� means up to 30 years (1455-1485) two dynasty �� York dynasty and Lancaster dynasty of the throne. -The translator �� Henry VII ascended the throne in 1485 years, married for Royal York stiff-necked, two family with marriage ended the war of the roses. -Translator on North American views of the current situation in the following pages, I will just provide some simple facts, obvious arguments and common sense.��������I asked readers ready, just get rid of prejudices and stereotypes, rational and emotional decision alone, a genuine official Park, from the modern binding and maximize your own opinion. The struggle between Britain and the United States on this subject, too many volumes have been published books. The class of people for different motives and hold a variety of purposes, participated in the debate; but all to no effect, the debate is over now.��������As a last resort of force determines this conflict: resort to force is chosen by the King, the North American continent has accepted this challenge. It is said that the late Mr. Beier ham (although he is a competent Minister, but he is not at fault) because his policies are temporary in nature and in the House of Commons under attack, and he answered and said, "they alive total can also be implemented.��������"If the colonial people in the current struggle to have such a bad idea, timidity generations is to hate to think of their ancestors ' names. The sun never shines through a more adequate admirable undertaking. This is not a city, to a State, a province or a Kingdom, but rather involves a continent �� at least on earth can one-eighth of the place of residence. This is not a day, a year or an era of things; in fact descendants are led into this fight, and even more or less affected by permanently present operations. Now is the North American continent, solidarity, faith and honour of sowing period.��������Today's little cracks, such as tips on a small Neem carved out of the tender skin of a name; the scars will be expanded with trees, in the future generations to see when it has become a few very eye-catching. As a result of concerns from the arguments to use force, a new era of politics began, a new way of thinking has produced. April 19, i.e. war plans �� all prior proposals, all become outdated very soon; these things while it was appropriate, now it's a useless, you can beam reset shelved.��������At the time the decision on the question of who finally comes down to the same point, namely the joint with the United Kingdom; the only difference is the implementation of this idea; a suggested the use of force, a party recommends the use of friendship; but far from the reality is that the former had failed, the latter no longer occur. Since the interests for reconciliation has been talked about a lot, but it has gone like a dream-like, does not render us what harvest, then we should look at the opposite side of the argument, slightly on the colony in liaison with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and subordination, now and later will always suffer the loss of many substances.����According to the natural principles and common sense to investigate the link and subordination to see if detach must rely on what, if a subordinate position so you can have what to expect. I heard someone simply say this: since the North American in previous contacts with the United Kingdom of Great Britain occurred once prosperous too, then to its future happiness, the same contact is necessary and will always produce the same result. There is no justification could be more wrong. You might as well say, because a child is brought up a feed, so he never eat meat, or rather, we begin with twenty years of his life should be a second twenty years of precedent. But this is sophistry argument; because I can categorically say that if it is not a European country to take care of it, so can the prosperity of North America, and maybe even thrive.����It's rich trade, belonging to the necessities of a class, as long as Europeans still eating habits, it always does not have a market. �� 1775 during the night of April 18, the United Kingdom armed forces from Boston, attempted to capture the North American Patriot store in Concord's supplies and arrest was knew their stay at Lexington nearby Sam �� Hancock �� Adam and John. In Paul �� Le dimensional ears and William �� Davis's call, armed citizens acting out, British troops on 19 April in Lexington and Concord area occurred in the battle. North American militia squad soldier thoroughly crushed the United Kingdom armed forces. The enemy only two thirds of the original strength left alive back to Boston. There you can hear the shot shooting, Thomas �� Paine believe could not be reconciled with the United Kingdom of Great Britain. -The translator but some say that the European countries have protection us.��������Yes, it has put us on its monopoly control, but it spends our money and its own money to defend the North American continent, it is also true that; however, for the same motive, that is to say in order to trade and the other player, it will defend the Turkey. Alas, we have long been a long history of prejudice, as superstitious as great sacrifice. We have boasted of protection under United Kingdom of Great Britain, not to notice it was motivated by interest instead of friendship; it is not for the sake of our sleeves protect us against our enemies invadingOffence, but rather to its own results in defense of its enemy, for any other reason defense those and there is no dispute, and for the same reason defense those will often and our adversaries. If the United Kingdom did not give up its North American self-assertion, North America will have to get rid of this subordination, in the case of France and Spain and the United Kingdom the outbreak of war, we can keep up with them. The last war the Hanover dynasty of the suffering caused by should remind us to oppose our linkages with the United Kingdom. The recent Congress argued that the colonies except through the parent country, there is no direct relationship to each other, that is, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and so on through the United Kingdom is the sister of colonies; of course, this is proof of the existence of each other have a beating about the Bush, but this is also demonstrated hostility (or hostile State, if I may say so) in the most simple and the only true statement.��������France and Spain has never been, perhaps will never be as enemies of the American people, just as the enemy of Great Britain subjects. But some say the United Kingdom is the parent State. It is particularly shameful acts. Wolves have yet not eat its child, savage also different relatives operations; therefore, the argument if correct, but on its condemnation; but that is just is not correct, or only partially correct, but the King and his gang of accomplices insidious use of Pro-State or home country this word, with a mean Catholic intention, to secretly influence our frankly weaknesses at heart. Europe, not the United Kingdom, is North America's parents. This new world had become Europe persecuted his passion for civil liberties and the religious freedom of the people of sanctuary.��������They fled here, is not to avoid the mother's comfort, but to avoid the abuse of one monster; from the initial migration Township that tyranny, also in chasing their descendants, the words on the United Kingdom, remains applicable.��������In vast areas of the world, we forget the 360 miles of narrow scope (the length of the United Kingdom), more large-scale dissemination of our friendship, we advocate that every Christian Europe maintain fraternal relationships, and such a liberal pride of mind. Come see us in expanding our worldwide community of friendship is how consistently and gradually overcome local bias of forces, it was very interesting. A born in the United Kingdom is divided into parishes of any city, nature only and he same parish people up close contact (because their interests in many aspects is common), and the name of the neighborhood to be recognized; if he ran away from home but a few miles away encounters the neighborhood, he would lose a sense of narrow streets, call him a fellow; if he walked out of the scope of the County, in the other counties met him in, he would forget about street and the city of smaller Division, he called the big Community Association, and the county; but if they travel abroad, by chance in France or Europe to meet any of the other part, to their minds of the local concept will be expanded to the United Kingdom with the people that idea. And so on, in North America or in any other region in the world meet all Europeans, are all great people: because the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, etc., with the entire world than in larger scale, position, and in smaller-scale divides Street, city and County of status; those that distinguish the too narrow in scope, not the people on the North American continent. Even in the State (Pennsylvania), United Kingdom residents were less than one third of future generations.��������Therefore, I call foul on this only in the United Kingdom's so-called Pro State or home country pseudo language was wrong, selfish, narrow and small device. However, even if we admit that he is a descendant of the United Kingdom, which have no meaning?. United Kingdom now that is a public enemy, it eliminated all other name and title: say what reconciliation is our duty, it is funny to the core.��������Now the Royal family of the first King (William I 's) is France, United Kingdom is currently half of noble descent France; therefore, the same reasoning method, the United Kingdom should be governed by the rule of France. With regard to the United Kingdom and colonies together between, people have been talking about it very much, say together they can fight with all countries in the world.��������But this is just conjecture; war fate is uncertain, the words themselves are worthless, because this continent must not willing to let people put its residents to support smoked, the United Kingdom in Asia, Africa or Europe's army. Secondly, the struggle with the countries of the world and we? our purpose is to engage in international trade and, if appropriate, it will be for us to win the whole of Europe in peace and friendship; because the whole of Europe are concerned, is to become a free port in North America.��������It will always be a barrier, but it has produced gold and silver, you can ensure that it is not affected by the alien invasion. I ask the most enthusiastic people who pointed out that the initiative of the reconciliation of the North American continent as a result of a joint with the United Kingdom of Great Britain may obtain a benefit. I repeat this, as I see it is a good or not.��������Our cereals in Europe any smooth sale on the market, we imported goods must be in place and we are willing to purchase deal. However, we combined with United Kingdom suffered harm and loss is abound; we are all human beings as well as our own responsibility to teach us to reject this Alliance because, on the United Kingdom of Great Britain any submission or dependence, will immediately put the continent involved in Europe's various wars and disputes, make us a conflict with a number of countries, those countries could have been willing to fight for our friendship, we are also not angry or dissatisfied with the reasons. Since Europe is our trade market, we should any part of Europe remain impartial. The real interests of North America is to avoid the various conflicts in Europe, if it because of subordination to the United Kingdom, United Kingdom political scales on a small method, it will never be in dispute. European Kingdom, is impossible to maintain peace, once the United Kingdom and the outbreak of war between any foreign country, in North America because of its relationship with the United Kingdom, in the trade will be destroyed. The next war may result not like last time, and if different, now drumThe person then blowing reconciliation will want to detach, because in that case the neutral will be better than soldiers to ship more secure escort. All correct or reasonable things to separation for defence. Killed human blood and creator sobbing in shouting: now is the time to break up. Even God United Kingdom placed in a location far away from North America, also naturally and effectively prove out, the United Kingdom on the United States have the power to this, is by no means God's intent. The North American continent from the discovery of the era, but also can increase the strength of this argument, then the distribution of national immigration makes this argument is even more convincing. Religious reform before the discovery of the Americas, as if God merciful.��������For subsequent years of persecution of people create a refuge, then national neither to their friendship, nor does it give them security. United Kingdom of Great Britain on the continent of authority, is a necessity to end sooner or later the Government: a seriously consider the issue of people suffering strongly believe, he called it "the present system of" this system is only temporary, in the heart of mercy, he look to the future, and will never be truly happy. We, as parents, now that you know this regime does not have a long life, are sufficient to guarantee we can pass on to future generations of anything, my heart is never happy with a simple demonstration of methods, since we will enable the next generation, others liabilities, we should own play, otherwise we treat their attitude was dirty and poor.��������In order to correctly find our responsibilities, we should take care of our children, our duty status in life the more advance several years; that high position will enable us to see a current some fear and prejudice are cloaked situation.��������Although I am willing to take care to avoid unnecessary made mistakes, but I would think that any support reconciliation argument can fall into the following categories.��������Grind heavy unreliable people, minds confused dull, unwilling to understand the things of the prejudice, there are a number of much importance to the stability of the European world; and this last category, due to a defect, considerations would be larger than the other three classes on the North American continent more disaster. Many people live in places, away from the current unfortunate events occurred in the field very far, this is their luck; scourge has not befall them in full by the door, so that they are North America's entire property in jeopardy. But let our imagination takes us to Boston for a while; the full disaster sites will teach us learn to be smart, and reminds us to always be the same, we can't be trusted to sever relations of power. But in a few months ago, the unfortunate city inhabitants still live a happy and prosperous life, but they are now subject to stay there starve or go begging to outside ①, there's no other way. If they continue to stay in the city, there were friends of artillery bombardment of dangerous, if they leave, will be the army looted; in the present circumstances, they are not prisoners of ... hope that, in General attacks to rescue them, they will be exposed to the fury of the two army gunfire. Being somewhat dull overlook the United Kingdom of Great Britain on our attack, still very optimistic, and shouted: come on, come on, even if this everything, we can and Yes. But please you investigate investigation of human feelings and sense: the reconciliation of claims according to the nature of the measure, and then tell me, you will still be able to love, respect and loyalty to get that kind of is already in your land's regime on the arson? if this all things you cannot do so, then you are right, as a result of your delay so that future generations have been destroyed. You are not respected, the United Kingdom and the United Kingdom for you to contact the future must be forced and not natural, and because it is only under the current expedient to form, it will soon revert to the more unfortunate than the original old. If you say you still tolerate those violations, so I want to ask that your House has been burned? your property has been in front of you? your wife and daughter have beds to sleep, have bread to eat? your parents and children had been their own death, and you are not in fact in a close shave? if you do not have these experiences, you will not be a good experience for those who have this kind of out of people's mood.��������But if you suffer a loss, but also with the murderer your fist, then you are not worthy as husband, father, friend or lover, and regardless of the status of your life or job titles, you have a coward's heart and ass ghost spirit. This is not the flames or exaggerate, but naturally consider legitimate feelings and emotions to examine these issues, in the absence of that kind of emotion and sentiment, we can't play the social responsibility of life, nor can you enjoy all the happiness in life. My point is not to expose the terrible scenes to provoke feelings of revenge, but to awaken us to no longer indecision, fuddled, to resolutely pursue certain objectives. If North America is not due to the delays and timid but from a position of being the conquerors, the United Kingdom or Europe is not North America.��������At present this winter if used properly, can be worth a era, but if you discuss their lives and playing suddenly, the entire continent was unhappy with; so long as such a valuable and useful season in hand wasted, so regardless of who he is, he served as what duties or where he lived in, any punishment he was well deserved. ① Boston residents have value 1 GBP 342 box tea into the sea, the United Kingdom Parliament to suppress these residents, adopted a series of measures, namely the so-called constitutional guarantees on stop some bills: from 1774, 6 1 January of the Boston Port Act, in the East India Company's losses to be compensated, the prohibition of all ships entering the port of the city. The second Act, where an accused in the performance of their duties committed the wrongful acts of Royal officials, other colonial and United Kingdom. The third act United Kingdom troops stationed in Boston, and a fourth Bill, the Governor to appoint local delegated representatives to the Conference. Limit the City meetings, take care of the appointment of the jurors, and so on. Paine adduced by BostonMeal of the public has no exaggeration. According to statistics, at the end of May to 1775, about 150 people in Boston on the brink of starvation. -Translator thinks that the continent can be prolonged by any foreign domination, this idea is brazen violation of, or the thing standing is not the historical precedent. Even United Kingdom most confident people do not think so. At this time, people even do all wisdom, to not talk about independent assurance that this continent supine, is impossible. Reconciliation in today is a ridiculous dream. The creator has abandoned this linkage, manpower and cannot be added. Because, as Milton are brilliantly expressed, "in mortal wounds of hatred has already cracked so deep and always produces a real reconciliation. "Each for peace of moderate means has been invalidated. Our previous plea has been rejected scornful; this allows us to believe that, to be repeated petitions could encourage Kings vanity and confirmed their stubborn �� and only that kind of approach would encourage European Kings of tyranny. Denmark and Sweden are good examples.��������Therefore, since the resistance will only be effective, then to God, we reached the last independent, not for the next generation in stigmatization of meaningless in the name of the parent-child relationship of toward extinction.��������To say that they no longer wish to do so, this is the imagination and unfounded; we had to cancel the stamp laws in connection with such ��, however a couple of years of effort to break our dreams; we also believe that those who have already conquered the country never again to pick up. As to the rule, the United Kingdom is not fair and reasonable attitude to this continent: it services will soon be very complex, not so far from us, on our ignorance of national legislations expedient can run, because if they can conquer us they will not be able to rule us. For one thing, or an application to always run sansiqian miles, in order to reply to wait four or five months, and be approved later need five or six months to be explained, in this case a few years will be as ridiculous and childish behavior.��������If in the past there was a time when it is appropriate, then now is it the right time no longer exists. Several not self-defence of small islands, the Government placed them �� protective under the appropriate object; but think a continent can never be an island regime, it is not ridiculous. In nature never make satellite is greater than its main precedent; since the United Kingdom and North America on the mutual relationship between the breach of the general laws of nature, so obviously they belong to a different system.��������United Kingdom is European, North American belongs to itself.��������I am not motivated by pride, parties or resentful motivation to embrace the idea of separation and independence; my conscience is clear and absolute belief that doing so is consistent with the true interests of the continent; the lack of any real interest is a hash, not able to provide a long happy �� this is so that our children and grandchildren were killed and more than a little strength, more cross-further to enable the continent to become the world's glorious moment retreat.��������Since the United Kingdom did not demonstrate the required reconciliation of meaning, we can be confident that we can get the conditions are not accepted in the North American continent, or you can achieve the aim of reach is that we have to pay for the loss of life and property. �� refers to the United Kingdom Government in 1765 was enacted in the "stamp", is intended to compensate for the United Kingdom since the conquest of Canada (1758-1760) of expenditure. -The translator �� in later some versions as "some of the Kingdom." �� The original editors the aim should always be the price with the right proportion with some. North of dismissal �� or entire abominable private party's dissolution, is to not on our great sacrifice. If we oppose all parliamentary bills really abolished, the interruption of trade to our losses, is enough to offset the effects of the repeal of the Act; however, if the entire continent must take up arms if everyone must become a soldier, that we do not deserve the light was against a base Cabinet. If we strive for is some Act repealed, then we spend the cost too much; because, in accordance with the fair estimate, to the law as to land the same pay a price for bankberg �� is the big silly things. I have always felt that the continent's independent, sooner or later will have an important task, in the same way, according to a recent continental rapid development to the mature stage, this affair is never far away. Therefore, the outbreak of the war had we not worth such a problem occurs, the problem if we do not seriously contend that, in the end it will be time to redress: otherwise it is equivalent to a complaint to the Court is a leasing period has just reached the tenants, request stop him violation of property rights, so as to cause in the Casino. In ominous 1775 April 19 in the past, I want to be the most longed for reconciliation, but hearing the days events, I would never deny the ruthless, surly United Kingdom Pharaoh �� and despise the bad guys, because although he is known as the "people of the presence of the father", but it can be hard to listen to their messages, the massacre of the soul were their blood while fighting fiercely so fall asleep. On the current capacity of North America: comes with some random thoughts both in the United Kingdom and North America, where I met people who have not frankly think that these two countries is a matter to the separation of powers.��������However, in the attempt to describe what we call the continent have independent conditions or expedient to declare independence, we are better than at any other time less published well-considered advice. Now that we all agree with this proposal, but is the time for the different views, then, to exempt from errors, we generally look at the situation, where possible efforts to find the right time. But I need not dwell on the formalities of the inquiry to an end immediately, because the time has come to find us����������A variety of comprehensive make do, that is, situations of encouraging consistency, evidence of this fact. Our great strength lies in solidarity, rather than the size of the number. However we are now enough to resist the force of the world. The North American continent now armed with complete and highly trained staff, more than any other country in the world, but also happens to be in force on this point, that is, a single colony cannot separate self-existence, but together as a whole but nothing could do it. Our land is more than adequate military strength, as for the Navy, as long as the continent continues to grab the hands of the United Kingdom, we cannot but acutely felt that it was never allowed the construction of a warship in North America.��������Therefore, even in a hundred years later, our sector is not more than the present; but the actual situation and perhaps also less today, because of reduced timber on a daily basis, and the last remaining some not so far away, it is not easy to obtain. If the continental population crowding, which in the present circumstances, the pain is unbearable. Harbour City, the more we need to be defensive and give up more of the city. We present the ratio of the number of lucky in harmony with our requirements, so no one doing nothing.��������Business reduction can produce an army, an army of necessities and produce a new business. We do not have debt, for this reason but owed debts, will be the glory of our virtues. As long as we can take the form of a fixation of the regime, a unique independent polity to future generations, take any cost in exchange for are cheap. However, if only in order to pursue the abolition of several heinous act and the Cabinet down now, then spent millions of pounds on cost-effective not coming, but this heir, is very cruel, because this means that we leave their is a need to be completed by the arduous work and one of them from the benefits of debt.��������There is pride of man should save this idea, this full-on behalf of the people and the small volume of boring politicians think. If successful, even if negative point debt is not worthy of our concerns. No country should have no debt. National debt is the nation's securities; even if it does not pay interest, nor is a heck of a job. United Kingdom liabilities in more than 140 million pounds, the interest paid by more than four million pounds. It has a powerful Navy, as its liabilities of compensation; North America has no debt, no Navy; however we only spent one twentieth of the United Kingdom Government bonds, we can have the same powerful naval.��������United Kingdom Navy in the current value is not a million pounds. This booklet of first and second paragraphs do not have the following calculations are now listed them in order to prove the above estimate is well-founded.��������See en Natick history of the Navy, introduction, p. 56. Each level of the cost of a ship of war, together with the mast, sails and truss, sails and rigging equipment costs, and in proportion to the storage of sailors and ship's eight months of food for thought, according to the Navy Minister Porcher Mr. calculation: a fitted with 100 Zun gun ships cost .........35, 553 pound a boat equipped with 90 superior gun ships cost ..........29, 886 pounds a fitted with 80 superior gun ships cost .......23, 638 pounds a ship equipped with 70 superior gun ships cost .......17, 785 pounds a ship is equipped with 60 superior gun ships cost .......14, 197 pounds a ship is equipped with 50 superior gun ships cost .......10, 606 pounds a ship is equipped with 40 superior gun ships cost .......7, 558 pounds a ship is equipped with 30 superior gun ships cost .......5, 846 pounds a ship equipped with 20 superior gun ships cost .......3, 710 pounds in this way, we'd easily total value of the United Kingdom all Navy or cost, because it was very popular in 1757 years of age have the following number of vessels and ships of the gun: a few artillery several ships cost full price 6 ......100.....35, 553 pound ....213, 318 pounds 12 ......90.....29, 886-pound ....358, 632 pounds 12 ......80.....23, 638 pounds ....283, 656 pounds 43 ......70.....17, 785-pound ....764, 755 pound 35 ......60.....14, 197 pounds ....496, 895 pounds 40 ......50 ...... 10,606 pounds ....424, 240-pound 45 ......40.....7, 558 pounds .....340.110 pounds 58 ......20.....3, 710 pounds 180 pounds 85 .....215, 2 3 266 786 000 170000 233 3 500 000 214 dhow, blasting the boat, set fire to ship each other together, pounds ... The price, pounds, pounds to acquire the balance of artillery, pounds, pounds total, no country in the world at such place or country such as North America to build a team from within the fleet. Tar, wood, iron and ropes are its natural products. We don't have to buy anything from abroad. Netherlands who send their vessels to Spain and Portugal, thereby gaining huge profits, but the raw materials that they use but most had to enter from abroad. Since the construction of the fleet in China has excellent natural conditions, we shall put the matter as a business. This is what we can do the most profitable investment. A completed naval fleet, worth more than its price; whereas the national policy of quite meaningful place lies in the commercial and defense. Let us build!If we do not need them, we can sell to cash and are silver instead of our money. On the configuration in the fleet personnel, most people's idea has a lot of errors; there's no need to have a quarter of a sailor. The "formal" armed civilian vessels, the "death" of the master, in the last war with any vessel for the most intense combat, but the ship sailor to 20 persons, although the number of 200 or more. As long as there are several competent, good at communication of sailors, can make many positive new sailors soon learns the ship's normal work. So, now that we have abundant supply of timber, our fishing grounds were blockaded, our sailors and ship Carpenter in unemployment, this time to open up our maritime business, can be said to be a golden opportunity. Forty years ago in New England made a few vessels equipped with 70 or 80 superior gun battleship, why not do the same? shipbuilding is North America's proud, and one day it will in this regard over the world. Most of the old empire of the East situated inland, therefore it is not possible to match with North America. Africa now still in the wild State; whereas any country in Europe is not so thoroughly Yi's coast, and there is no such domestic raw material supply. Nature bestowed for humanity, often on the one hand, on the other hand mean generously; only on the West side of North America, it is very generous.��������Vast Russia Empire little sea road, so it's endless forests, asphalt, iron and ropes are commodities. From the security side, should we not fleet? we are not insignificant 60 years ago people; then we might have put the property on the street, or better to say is placed in the field, the portal having to close the lock can be slept peacefully. Now things different, our way of self-defence should increase as our property has been improved. Twelve months ago, a typical pirate is likely to be traced back to the Delaware River, residents of Philadelphia; any extortion money to other parts of the same accidents that may occur. Not only that, any swift guy using a is equipped with 14 or 16 guns of two-masted ship, maybe you can put the entire continent, steal five million pounds of money.��������These situations are worthy of our attention, and also pointed out the need for coastal defence. Some people might say, we speak with the United Kingdom and in the future, it will protect us. Are they so ignorant that they think it will in order to protect us in our harbour to a naval? common sense tells us that we have always tried to implement the repression of the country is all countries least equipped to defend us. It can be implemented in the guise of friendship; name of subjugating and ourselves, in the long-term after a valiant resistance, finally will cheated and is a slave state. If we should not allow its warships into our port, does it do to protect our? long sansiqian miles of Navy is not useful in a sudden emergency simply useless. Therefore, if we later had to self-defence, why not do it yourself? why relying on someone else? United Kingdom warships of the list is long and more, but you can use the vessel at any time not to one-tenth, many now no longer exists; however as long as the ship left a plank, their name will always remain in the list. You can use vessels, while parked at any military port in alternate, less than one-fifth. East Indies, West Indies, Eastern Mediterranean, Africa and the United Kingdom forces expanded to other regions, are submitted to it by the Navy of great demand. Because of our psychological mixed with prejudice and neglect, we United Kingdom Navy had a wrong idea about seems to think that we are at the same time and it's all naval confrontation, thus we found we must have a similarly large Navy is good: this cannot be implemented immediately, has been a hidden Tory party used to attempt to discourage our construction of Navy's initial plan. This idea is probably the most errors; because, as long as the United Kingdom in North America have one-twentieth of the ships of the Navy, it certainly can be a strong opponent of the United Kingdom; because, since we do not and will not stand for a foreign authority, we are all of the Navy can be used on their own coast, where we will be more than double the advantages accounted for the other, while the other was able to attack in the past, must sail three thousand miles away, and shall undergo the same distance back to repair ships and supplementary provision.��������Although the United Kingdom relies on its fleet, we can be truncated on European trade, but we also can truncate the United Kingdom to West Indies trade, because the Indies is located near the North American continent is totally in control of it. If we actually did not consider it necessary to maintain the standing of the Navy, that would also be able to work out a bid to keep navies peacetime military strength. If rewards business people build up some equipped with 20, 30, 40 or 50 superior gun vessels (bonus amount to merchant in terms of loss of cargo volume size proportion), so long as there is such a vessel, aircraft, plus a few vessels often on guard-ship, you can maintain a sufficient naval force, such an approach can make our own from the United Kingdom are headache, that kind of bad luck in bearing peacetime let fleet stopped at the shipyard to rot away.��������Put the power of the commercial and defense, is the right policy; because when our strength and wealth of mutually beneficial effect occurs, we need not fear foreign enemies. Almost any kind of defence supplies we have very rich. Production of ramie everywhere, so we do not lack the rigging. We iron quality than other countries. Our light than any similar weapons. Cannon is we can freely cast. Nitrates and gunpowder our daily production. Our knowledge of every promotion. Strong is our inherent qualities, but courage also never too us. Therefore, we also need? why hesitate? apart from destruction, we cannot expect to get from the United Kingdom. If it has again been recognized to have sovereignty in North America, the continent is not worth to stay. The four riots, jealousies, who are willing to come forwardCome MI ping them? who are willing to risk their lives to force his compatriots to foreign domination? Pennsylvania and Connecticut on some boundary dispute unresolved areas, indicating that the United Kingdom's regime is not important and sufficient proof that only the North American continent of regime to manage the Affairs of the North American continent. Sufficient to indicate it is a great opportunity for another reason: our number less, yet people occupy place more, these places if you are not the King casually gave him superficiality of servant, in future, you can use to not only repay the current debt, and regular maintenance of government expenditure.��������There's no such thing as a country with such favourable conditions. What we call the colonial infantilism status, is an enabling environment for independent and must not be detrimental to separate arguments. We have quite a large number of people, if you increase the number again, could be worse on solidarity. This is a question, that is, the more a country's population, their armies. The number of people in the army, the ancients far exceed the moderns: this point is obvious, because, since trade is large results, dedicated to the business, not to pay attention to anything else. Business has been reduced by patriotic and military defense of the spirit. The full history tells us that the most courageous performance is always in a State of infancy period. As business development, United Kingdom has lost its spirit. London City is a large population, but with a coward's conservation efforts suffer repeated insult. People have may lose the thing, the more the more they are not willing to take risks.��������Wealthy people in general are fear of slaves, like the miserable creatures of bad people like pretended to be cautious with subservient to the Palace of forces. Youth is a good habit of planting season, in the individual case, in the country. To 50 years after the North American continent is composed of a single Government, if not impossible, maybe is difficult. By trade and population increases by a wide range of stakeholders, will produce confusion. A colony will be against another colony. Each of the colonies as feathers, contempt for full mutual help: arrogant stupid people with its limited a little complacency, people will sit to the elements, sorry no early organization Union. So, now is an Alliance of excellent opportunity. In the infancy of friendship and in trouble in the intimate feelings, is the most durable of all sentiments and unshakable.��������Our current Alliance marks the two characteristics: we also are minors, and we have suffered the misfortune; but our solidarity has resisted disaster, is to create a sufficient to later take pride in the memorable century. Furthermore, this period is a country only once encountered special period, that is itself formed a Government. The majority of countries missed the opportunity, and thus had to accept the conquerors of the law, not for their own legislation.��������First, they have a King, followed by a system of Government; so will first develop rule provisions or on Charter, then the delegate some people turned out to be implemented: but we might as well from other States errors lesson in, grab the opportunity now, from the beginning will properly handle the regime questions. When William I of the conquest of the United Kingdom, he had forced them to accept legal; likewise, we agree with the North American Central Government should possess legal and real position in the past, we will have real power status as one of the lucky bastard the takeover of danger, he might have the same attitude towards us, then our freedoms? our property? as religion, I believe that protect all sincerely declare their religious beliefs, is an essential responsibility of Government, and I do not know if the Government in this regard, there are other necessary measures. If you put aside all the little ghost does not want to leave that kind of narrow psychological and selfish principle on this issue, you will immediately get rid of fear. Suspicion is small heart lies in the partnership, are all happy social life of poison. In my own case, I fully and in good faith believe that among us there to a wide variety of religious beliefs, it was the will of God.��������This gives us Christians a carry forward the goodwill of a broader field: If we thought exactly the same way, our religions tend to lack of inspection; according to this principle is not biased, I put the various sects among us as a child, but their so-called mutual have different names. In this article 34-35 page, I have the characteristics of the continent's Charter just disclosed information views (because I think that is providing clues instead of plan), ventured here, once again brought this question, I think a Charter can be understood as everyone must participate in the performance of the Covenant, the sacred obligation to maintain each individual parts, religious, occupational freedom or property rights.��������Solid and reliable contractual and fair treatment can make friendship Cove. Previously I have mentioned, there is a broad and equitable representation of necessity; there was no other political issues could be more worthy of our attention. Electorate and representation, equal is dangerous. But if the number of representatives is not only small, but does not mean that the risk is even greater. I cite the following things as examples; when participating in joint campaign of the people's petition submitted to the Pennsylvania House of representatives of Parliament, the Council has 28 members; eight Bo banks County members unanimously voted against, there are seven Chester County also step up their footsteps, the whole State by District manipulated by two County; whereas this danger is always easy. The House of representatives at the last meeting the threatened to suppress the State's representative, that someone should prompt attention to all the people, they are knocked out of the power entrusted. Prepared to give them all on behalf of a set of instructions is andience, these instructions from common sense and business sense is even pupils feel shame, but they are a minority, even a very small number of people out there in favour of the future, and brought her to the Board, where members would be adopted on behalf of the State; on the other hand, if people know the Parliamentary State begin to develop someNecessary public measures have anything malicious, they will not hesitate to believe that those members were worthy of that trust. Urgent need to make a lot of things with expediency in nature, these temporary if you continue to use it, it will become suffering. An expedient and proper conduct. When North American disaster need consultation resolved, by several state legislatures in the House of representatives for this purpose and assign some people out, but the most simple or it can be said that at that time was the most appropriate approach; they work has shown the wisdom of this continent from destruction. However, since we can't always have a "Parliament," every good order with warm wishes a person must be recognized that the election of Board members is worth considering.��������I want to study human people raised the question of the same group of people with the power of representative and elections; this power is not too big when we make a plan for future generations, we should remember that virtue is not genetic. We often get from enemy is rather useful motto, always be errors in the sense that they began to use reason to make a sound judgment. Cornwall (financial member) to scorn toward New York State Assembly House of representatives of the petition, because he said the State Council of the House of representatives only 26 members, he stressed that the number cannot be properly used to represent the whole. We thank him for the violation of the intent of honesty. �� �� readers do so fully understanding the wide and equal representative for a State, how important it is, you should read the wave that research on the political. Author �� on the whole, no matter how strange that some people feel that, regardless of whether they are willing to make such a thought, it doesn't matter, but we can cite many powerful and significant grounds to indicate that only openly and flatly declared independence, to quickly solve our problems. One of the reasons are: first, in accordance with international practice, when any two countries warring, by not participating in a number of other countries dispute mediation, the conclusion of the preliminary provisions of the Treaty. But as long as the North American continent, people also claimed for the United Kingdom of Great Britain's subjects, any State regardless of whether it is with much to us, will not be able to pose as the mediator.��������Therefore, in the present circumstances, we may argue forever.��������Second, some people think that France or Spain will help us, if we only intend to use this kind of help to compensate for the United Kingdom paycheck, consolidating relations with the North American continent; it is not reasonable, because the consequences will enable those countries to suffer loss. Third, as long as we also admit to United Kingdom subjects, we in the foreign eyes must be regarded as the "rebels". Many people in the name of the subjects are up in arms, this precedent on foreign law and somewhat dangerous.��������We can resolve this conflict, but to put the resistance and surrender, but requires a much more subtle, not ordinary people can understand.��������Fourth, if we made a declaration, it distributed to the various foreign officer Jung, our suffering and our line of invalid peace remedies; also announced that, since we can no longer in the cruel British Ting rule too happy or safety of life, we have forced and not all links different it cut, and to all those who Ting that they have the will, hope for peace with their trade: a memorandum for the continent, the ratio of a petition to the United Kingdom to the boat, which can produce better results.��������We are currently with the name of the United Kingdom subjects, in a foreign country cannot be accepted, nor can it be admitted that: it is the practice of States in the Imperial Court against us, and will always be this way, until we pass independent and side-by-side with other countries. The action at first glance might be strange and difficult, but as we have already experienced all the steps of the other, will soon become very fit, not shout.��������In the Declaration of independence, the North American continent will feel like such a man, he always had some unpleasant things to grow indefinitely, but he knew that this thing is not to do, just do not want to work with the expectation that it will have been resolved, while the need to remember it. Report of recorded since the first edition of this booklet, the advent or it can be said that in the day of publication, the Crown in Parliament's speech in this city (Philadelphia). If the prophecy of God has mastered the production of this work, it will never put it in a more appropriate juncture or more necessary time published. On the one hand the bloodthirsty mentality prove that on the other hand is precise approach was taken. People from retaliation in all this. King's speech Daunt, contrary to the principle of independent and decisive. Follow etiquette, or even to remain silent, regardless of their motivation, if somewhat despicable and vicious tacit consent, would have harmful tendency; therefore, if this motto can recognize, it will be able to conclude that the Crown of speech since the very diabolical, it should be and the more should be subject to the General Assembly and the people. However, because a country's domestic justice relies mainly on that can be called the "national sport" of simplicity, so often it is best with disdain of psychological put some things lightly, and not to use that kind of may the peace and security and the role of guardian of the resulting changes to show dislike the new method. Perhaps, mainly due to the cautious attitude, King's speech is so far not been public condemnation. The speech, if you called the speech, but also to many just on truth, public welfare and the survival of mankind; wanton deliberate slander is sacrificing human sacrifice to the arrogant tyrant of formal and solemn method. However, this collective massacres human atrocities is King ' a privilege and a corollary; because if the creator does not know them, they would not know the creator, though they are created by our own people, they do not know us, and be their God the creator. The speech is a benefit, the Crown does not intend to take it to deceive us, and we even like, cannot be spoofed. Unreasonable and oppressive suddenly now availablePaper. It is not our confused: even in reading, each row make us believe that, in the forest for hunting of naked rough Indians, as brutal as United Kingdom King. Hypocritical, as the United Kingdom by North American residents of the people of the book of this article is full of insidious works of moaning assumes author John �� Dalrymple, maybe ever took it for granted that the people here can be him for a King's vaunted and scared, thus described on (although he is very clever) and now the State of true character. "But," the authors say, "If you would like to commend a us on it and not dissatisfied with the Government (which means the revocation of the stamp Act-gold Hamlin Marquis �� Cabinet), you go to praise the Lord, that's not fair, because only with his consent, they are allowed to do anything. "This is the full protection of the King! here is even not concealing of idolatry.��������Whoever can remain indifferent to listen and tolerance so that he has lost the right to tell the truth �� betray the traitor of personality �� and should be considered as not only abandoned the human dignity, and has since left the position of an animal, like a caterpillar-like in the world to crawling with sordid. However, now the King had done is irrelevant: he has already broken the humanity of every kind of moral obligation, trample on the nature and sprinkled, and because of pride and spirit inherent cruelty, already own to widespread resentment. Now the North American continent, there is an urgent need to find a way out for itself. It already had a young family, its responsibility is to take care of the family, rather generously brought out property, to support a dishonor to the human and Christian's reputation of the regime �� your duty is to comply with a State of moral principle, compliance with your sect or denomination which ethical principles, and at the same time, more direct protection of the public freedom, if you want to save our land is not affected by the corruption from Europe, you are sure to secretly want independence. However, cast aside the moral part to allow all people to think, I will primarily be made on the following issues: caveats ��-gold Hamlin Marquis is a Whig party leader of the Liberals.��������-The translator first, independent from the United Kingdom, is consistent with the interests of the North American continent.��������Second, reconciliation or independent, which a programme is the most simple, practical? here attached some necessary instructions. In support of reconciliation, if I am not judging error, I can say this continent some of the most talented and most experienced people. They advocated for this issue has not been publicly announced. In fact, this opinion is self-evident because no country, if the subordinate position of foreign countries, commercial limited, legislative power is restrained, it is never eZ publish to the crucial role. The North American continent also did not know what is wealthy, although it has been some development in other countries is unparalleled in history, but it it can achieve success, but also, and if the infant age as it should have been mastered the legislative power, that kind of success is completely achievable. United Kingdom today are complacent to drool at the once fulfilled when it is no good thing, and the North American continent is hesitant to such a question, this question if ignored, will make it last tends to perish. United Kingdom to derive benefit, is North America's business, not the conquest of North America, if two countries like France and Spain the same do not belong to this kind of business relationship are to continue in the many articles: because, either party could not find a better market.��������This country from the United Kingdom or any other country and independent, but are worth debating key and the only problem, it's like everything else must be discovered the truth, will increasingly become clear and strong.��������First, because it will sooner or later will have this result.��������Second, because the longer protracted, completed up to the more difficult. I often like to participate in public meetings and private parties, butterfly beauty that those without thinking people will speak as if justified fallacy. I have heard many fallacies, following advice seems to be the most common, namely: If such a breach occurs at 40 or 50 years later than now, the North American continent will be able to get rid of the subordination. For this I can say that our current military skills are obtained from the last war �� experience, another 40 to 50 years is going to fail completely. By that time the Mainland will not be left with a general or an officer; and we, or our successors, in military matters will like ancient Indians like ignorance. This argument alone, if you are paying close attention, will undoubtedly prove that this time is the time than all other more favorable. Then the demonstration becomes this: at the end of the last war, we have the experience, but not enough number of past 40 or 50 years, we will have enough strength and no experience; therefore, the appropriate time should be at a point between the two ends, at this point, both to ensure the adequate experience, but also a considerable increase in the number of people.��������But that time is now. Please forgive me if I say that these readers digression, because this is not a direct from my first started discussing representations, now I'm back in the following proposition: in the unlikely event that forbids us rift with the United Kingdom temporarily make up for it, it still retained on North American sovereignty and sovereign (along with the development of the situation now, North America is completely abandoned this argument), we'll make you lose that repayment of the debts owed to us or further borrowing.��������Remote regions (due to the unreasonable extension of Canada's territory, some provinces �� in remote areas have been secretly losses) of the value of every 100 acres in only five pounds, more than 25 million dollars up to Pennsylvania; immunization in the tax to a penny per acre, the years up to $ 2 million. Sell these lands, it is possible to manage debt, and not cause any involvement; on land the reserved service tax will often reduce and sooner or later, fully supply the Government's annual expenses. At what period is no debts,Make much sense, as long as the sale of land can be used to pay on line, all things temporarily Delegate Assembly from the Mainland. Now I start on the second issue, namely: reconciliation or independent, which a programme is the most simple, practical, and by the way, as some instructions.��������All things natural process as a guide to action, which would be difficult to refute, according to this rationale, I generally answered: it is a unique independent simple routes, its right to me; and reconciliation is a very complex issue, a treacherous, erratic Court must intervene in, then just might have a solution. ① means 1754-1760 United Kingdom settlers since the Ohio Valley on France and the struggle of the Indians. -The translator ② 1774, the United Kingdom Parliament passed the Quebec Act, the North West of Al zinken throughout the Northwest Territories are merging in Quebec (Canada), which aims to ensure the United States access to the landlord and the support of the Catholic monks. -The translator's present situation in North America every thinking man seems to be really serious. No laws, no Government, on the basis of the dividing the gracious and warm the powers to no other right of any kind. It is an unprecedented feeling of being together, but this feeling is easily changed, each hidden enemies are trying to be neutralised. We now have legislation without law, wisdom and no programme, a system without a name, but particularly surprising is desperately want a subordinate position in full independence. This situation is unprecedented, never existed, who can say it's results? in the present situation without any restriction, any person's property are not guaranteed. People listen to the nature of mind, not ignored, they do not see in front of goal, is the pursuit of fantasy or rumor indicated direction. Nothing can be considered a crime, there is no such thing as rebellious; so everyone thinks she can do what she likes, to do whatever they want. Tory party who is not afraid to blustered Xiao-up, if they know that this action will cause them to lose their lives in front of the law of the land. Captured in the fighting and the United Kingdom soldiers caught hand weapons of North American residents should draw the line between. The former is captured, while the latter is a traitor.��������A deprivation of his liberty, another to cut off his head. Although we are intelligent, in some of our action is obvious, fuelling indecisive opinions of differences. "Mainland" buckle belt too loose; if not timely to take measures that will be too late to do anything, then we will fall into a kind of neither the reconciliation cannot be implemented independent of the wretched situation. The King and his followers were busy little focus on applying the same trick to split the continent, many of us are willing to spread lies and seem to run the print shop.��������A few months ago in New York two newspapers and two newspapers of the changeable hypocritical of letter, proof of some people is neither wise nor honest. Hiding in a corner, and what it makes, light in the hole is easy reconciliation.��������But such a number of people are seriously considering how difficult this process, if there is a continental and split words how dangerous they are noticed all kinds of people, these people's situation and the situation and their own situation and circumstances should be taken into account in this regard? they ever put themselves think of those who have lost everything, think of the victims in order to defend their own country and to abandon all soldiers? if their robust confused look only for their own personal situations regardless of others, in the end it will convince them, "they are allowed to decide." Some people say, we put back into the us in the position of 1763 ① looks. For this I replied that this request is not being able to agree that the United Kingdom, it will not be made to the requirements; however, if this may exist, if such a request can be satisfied, then I naturally have to ask: How can allowing such a corrupt, no friend of the Court to fulfil their obligations? another assembly that does not, even now that Parliament, in future a pretext that such obligations are enforced and in possession of, or the original consent is foolish, therefore decided to be eliminated; in that case, is there any way to get right? can't complaint States: the cannon is the lawyer of the Kings; the judgment is not the cause of the judicial power, but rather of force. Return to 1763, just put the legal status of the same is not enough, but to make our environment are also placed in the same State to do; we were burned and destroyed the city should be built up again, our personal losses should receive compensation, we borrowed for Defense and public debt repayment; otherwise we will admire than the period of bad millions times. Such a request, if you are in a year ago, it might also be able to vote-mainland people's mind, but now it's too late. "Things have developed to the irreversible. "① i.e. 1763 Treaty of Paris, under the Treaty, France lost its colony, and the United Kingdom were received vast areas of North America's entire tenure. -The translator also, just to stick to cancel a financial Act and the use of force, as like the use of force to compel such an Act, it was built for God cannot be allowed by law and is contrary to human feelings. Any of them, on the one hand and should not be resorted to in order to achieve the purpose, because human life valuable, not in this mini-at the end of the matter waves roll off. On the application of our personal and threaten our is violence; we are armed forces to destruction of property; the angle by means of our countries considering it's aggression. This situation makes us from conscience felt the need to take up arms. In this way becomes necessary to defend itself, we all obey the United Kingdom in respect of the stop, North American independent of age shall be considered to be in on it to launch the first rounds when they started, and by the bullets are announced. This line is consistent; it is neither a random draw, nor to the ambitionsExtended, but by no means due to the spate of colonial events. I will use these timely and well-meaning advice to conclude my remarks. We should be aware that this year the independent can take three different methods, but three of the sooner or later will decide the fate of North America; they are relying on the people in the Parliament's legitimate voice, rely on military force, or rely on civilian uprising. But our citizens fighters not always, but the crowd would not necessarily always a rational person collection of; as I have indicated, morality is not a genetic nor will never change. If the country's independence from the above three methods of the first implementation, we will have a variety of opportunities and incentives to build the world's most noble, most pure form. We are able to start rebuilding the world. Since primeval times hasn't happened as the present case. The birth of a new world is not far away, maybe like the whole of the European population, as many a new generation will be from a few months of the event gets what they deserve a free.��������This is serious, from this point of view, a small number of cowardly or impartial person of unwarranted allegations be remembered with the cause of world significance; it is when compared to how small, how funny. If we ignore the present favourable beautiful period, later by using any other method to implement independent, so must the consequences, it will be our own, or rather are those who often do not study or consideration rashly opposed the measures one-track. You can cite a number of reasons to support the independence of these grounds is people should think privately rather than publicly discussed. We are not supposed to debate whether or not we will separate issues, but should try to make every effort to secure, reliable and legitimate basis for independence, and which has not been initiated but is disturbed. Every day, so we believe that the need for independence. Even the Tory Party (if there are some among us who) should be more enthusiastic than others to be advocated: because, the establishment of the initial Committee ① protect them not as people resent, likewise, a reasonable and properly established system of Government, will be to further protect their security only reliable method.��������Therefore, if their virtue enough so that they become independent party people, they really reasonable, want independence. ① means 1772-1774, established by the Communications Committee, the United Kingdom by the North American thirteen colonies composed of revolutionary local power. -The translator's overall, independence is maintained, and our unique ties of solidarity. Then we will see our goals, our ears also does not believe an sneaky and brutal enemies of all kinds of conspiracy. And, we then will stand in the proper position to treat the United Kingdom; because we have reason to assert that the United Kingdom Palace negotiations with North American Federal peace terms, than it is called the "rebellious people" who talks to rapprochement condition, less in self-esteem by some injury. We are independent of changes over time, contributing to its desire to conquer our desire and our hesitation, only extended the role of the war. Now that we have accomplished nothing to stop us trade to vent our dissatisfaction, now we may wish to try another independent approach to mitigate our discontent, and then automatically open trade. United Kingdom traders and informed individuals is also with us, because that business can do for peace environment, than without trade war came good.��������If this proposal is not accepted, then we can move to a different court. I put the issue on this basis. Since no one can refute comments this booklet of previous edition in the stands, so can be used as evidence to the contrary: this proposition cannot be disputed, or are in favour of the proposition that there are too many people, cannot be opposed. Therefore, let us not with a suspicion of, or doubts of Psychology-see each other, but each person to the sincere friendship of the hand to the neighborhood, to draw a line, the line like a pardon was granted, will not go to pursue various disputes before. Let the independence party and the name of the Tory party eliminated; let people hear in our midst, but belongs to good citizens, Frank and strong friends, human rights and freedoms and the independence of the North American Federation of courageous champion.