I'm in Xinzhou economic "Belle" Forum view _ party gang

Received a letter from the newspaper reporters this morning, shortly after sticking to it. <wbr> <wbr> Reporter: online today such a script: the official website for beauty Forum officials justify use of beautiful women to economic development. See gender culture after .feeling with a great relationship, but also the lack of precise knowledge, therefore, to ask you again. <wbr> Questions are as follows: <wbr> <wbr> 1, so-called "beauty economy", the essence of what is .feminine when?, consumer goods, or a concept we confined to traditional, temporarily unable to accept new ideas, new approaches? beauty economy ", although feel uncomfortable, however, my personal forum based on the overall style, still think this initiative of the .local government. 3, Shanxi Xinzhou Government website posts, "beauty" of two initiatives in the economy is simply playing diao Chan brand and elected Shanxi Xinzhou tourism the two presenters, and did not see anything unique. Especially the latter, everywhere. Such a ."beauty economy", really in social ethics, economic development, law, tradition and so well balanced? how would you rate this economic "beauty?": Vincent Fang is well balanced in every respect, and not very important. As long as no .violation of the law. As long as not too challenging sense of ethics and the public. At present, such initiatives did not break the law, did not challenge the mainstream of ethics and values. 4, in the Forum post, no lack of " .beauty is productivity, "" famous dead man can stand up to make money on what you do, what to pack, how to develop, "" beauty is irresistible allure, glamour's charming, beautiful hometown will create and develop a more splendid "in this .statement, how do you judge? especially the "beauty is the productivity"! party just to hear such words alone:, feel really bad mood. However, I think it is necessary to comprehensively objectively. For example, "beauty is productivity," .if we say that beauty sexy, the body is productivity is, of course, the we oppose. However, from the overall style of the Forum, or emphasize beauty appeal, appeal, and not a consumer object. So, I think it should be .inclusive and tolerant. Local officials, no gender awareness education, lack of feminist spirit, is understandable. As long as their behaviour is not really an insult and injury in women, and should not be simply because a negative word. 5, can be seen .from these posts, it was "beautiful economy" and "beauty economy" concept confusion, through the "beautiful economy" (such as plastic, cosmetic, etc), try party just: beauty economy appeared inappropriate wording, but also very offensive to the .public, particularly to the feminist perspective, is the reference to the consumer, the female is not good. However, I feel that a transaction should not simply look at its name, but should look at its essence. Figure derived from the "Belle economic .rationality. "This logic, how do you judge? party just: I think that from a feminist perspective, plastic surgery, cosmetic beauty of the" economic "," with the consumption of female beauty economy ", essentially the same, are women as .ornamental objects. However, as ornamental objects are not necessarily bad, man can become the object of women to watch, in reality this phenomenon already exists. Importantly, viewing, in either the "beauty" or "handsome" for signs marketing place, provided .that they do not stigmatize female or male, it is not a big mistake. Like this website, the introduction of contemporary beauty, mainly from the angle of their success, I feel very good. 6, the so-called beauty economy, whether there .is discrimination, women face discrimination. Party just: may exist but do not necessarily exist. Not because the reference to "beauty" is considered to be discriminatory, but rather to look at how to deal with "Belle," how to use the " .Belle ". Forum link address http:www.sxxz.gov.cntempletlist_xz.php?id=159 I see the Forum article, see no female" consumption ". The so-called" consumption "which should mean specifically directed at female beauty and .physical characteristics, emphasizes female stereotypes, etc. While the Forum, also describes many successful women, their aggressive & # 65292; their efforts, their careers. In other words, the overall feeling is building a positive image of women. If the site is .sexy pictures, nude pictures, or more beautiful women's erotic story that I think that is another matter. But in fact, is not. So, I think we should be tolerant attitude to this matter. At the same time also inclusive "letter from today ., the newspaper reporters received shortly after sticking to it. Reporter: online today such a script: the official website for beauty Forum officials justify use of beautiful women to economic development. See gender culture after feeling with a great relationship, but also the lack of .precise knowledge, therefore, to ask you again. Issue: 1, so-called "beauty economy", the essence of what is feminine when?, consumer goods, or a concept we confined to traditional, temporarily unable to accept new ideas, new .approaches? party just: beauty economy appeared inappropriate wording, but also very offensive to the public, particularly to the feminist perspective, is the reference to the consumer, the female is not good. However, I feel that a transaction should not simply look at .its name, but should look at its essence. I read the article in the Forum, see no female "consumption". The so-called "consumption" which should mean specifically directed at female beauty and physical characteristics, emphasizes female stereotypes, etc. .While the Forum, also describes many successful women, their spirit, their efforts, their careers. In other words, the overall feeling is building a positive image of women. If the site is sexy pictures, nude pictures, or more beautiful women's erotic story .that I think that is another matter. But in fact, is not. So, I think we should be tolerant attitude to this matter. At the same time also inclusive "beauty economy" indecent. 2. whether there is "beauty economy? this .reference itself is a gimmick or really anything? party just: beauty economy does exist. It is typically used to refer to consumer women and beauty, the female as a consumer, a subordinate objects. For example, shows the female nude, showing women sexy .features, etc. This is discrimination against women. But I think this forum, although the term is also used, however, establish a positive image of women. Local government officials want to find a selling local "selling points" to meet the immediate economic ."Belle" indecent. <wbr> <wbr> <wbr> 2. what exists today received a letter from the newspaper reporters, after sticking to reply. Reporter: online today such a script: the official website for beauty Forum officials justify use of .beautiful women to economic development. See gender culture after feeling with a great relationship, but also the lack of precise knowledge, therefore, to ask you again. Issue: 1, so-called "beauty economy", the essence of what is feminine when .?, consumer goods, or a concept we confined to traditional, temporarily unable to accept new ideas, new approaches? party just: beauty economy appeared inappropriate wording, but also very offensive to the public, particularly to the feminist perspective, is the reference to .the consumer, the female is not good. However, I feel that a transaction should not simply look at its name, but should look at its essence. I read the article in the Forum, see no female "consumption". The so-called ."consumption" which should mean specifically directed at female beauty and physical characteristics, emphasizes female stereotypes, etc. While the Forum, also describes many successful women, their spirit, their efforts, their careers. In other words, the overall feeling is building a .positive image of women. If the site is sexy pictures, nude pictures, or more beautiful women's erotic story that I think that is another matter. But in fact, is not. So, I think we should be tolerant attitude to this matter. At .the same time also inclusive "beauty economy" indecent. 2. whether there is "beauty economy? this reference itself is a gimmick or really anything? party just: beauty economy does exist. It is typically used to refer to consumer women and beauty, .the female as a consumer, a subordinate objects. For example, shows the female nude, showing women sexy features, etc. This is discrimination against women. But I think the Forum & # 65292; although the term is also used, however, establish .a positive image of women. Local government officials want to find a selling local "selling points" to meet the immediate economic "" Belle? this reference itself is a gimmick or really anything? party just: beauty economy does exist. It is typically used .to refer to consumer women and beauty, the female as a consumer, a subordinate objects. For example, shows the female nude, showing women sexy features, etc. This is discrimination against women. But I think this forum, although the term is also .used, however, establish a positive image of women. Beauty economy ", although feel uncomfortable, however, my personal forum based on the overall style, still think this initiative of the local government. 3, Shanxi Xinzhou Government website posts," beauty " .of two initiatives in the economy is simply playing diao Chan brand and elected Shanxi Xinzhou tourism the two presenters, and did not see anything unique. Especially the latter, everywhere. Such a "beauty economy", really in social ethics, economic development, law ., tradition and so well balanced? how would you rate this economic "beauty?": Vincent Fang is well balanced in every respect, and not very important. As long as no violation of the law. As long as not too challenging sense of ethics .and the public. At present, such initiatives did not break the law, did not challenge the mainstream of ethics and values. 4, in the Forum post, no lack of "beauty is productivity," "famous dead man can stand up to make .money on what you do, what to pack, how to develop, "" beauty is irresistible allure, glamour's charming, beautiful hometown will create and develop a more splendid "in this statement, how do you judge? especially the" beauty is the productivity ."! party just to hear such words alone:, feel really bad mood. However, I think it is necessary to comprehensively objectively. For example," beauty is productivity, "if we say that beauty sexy, the body is productivity is, of .course, the we oppose. However, from the overall style of the Forum, or emphasize beauty appeal, appeal, and not a consumer object. So, I think it should be inclusive and tolerant. Local officials, no gender awareness education, lack of .feminist spirit, is understandable. As long as their behaviour is not really an insult and injury in women, and should not be simply because a negative word. 5, can be seen from these posts, it was "beautiful economy" and "beauty economy ."concept confusion, through the" beautiful economy "(such as plastic, cosmetic, etc), try local government officials want to find a selling local" selling points today received a letter from the newspaper reporters, after sticking to reply. Reporter: online .today such a script: the official website for beauty Forum officials justify use of beautiful women to economic development. See gender culture after feeling with a great relationship, but also the lack of precise knowledge, therefore, to ask you again. Issue: 1, .so-called "beauty economy", the essence of what is feminine when?, consumer goods, or a concept we confined to traditional, temporarily unable to accept new ideas, new approaches? party just: beauty economy appeared inappropriate wording, but also very .offensive to the public, particularly to the feminist perspective, is the reference to the consumer, the female is not good. However, I feel that a transaction should not simply look at its name, but should look at its essence. I read the article .in the Forum, see no female "consumption". The so-called "consumption" which should mean specifically directed at female beauty and physical characteristics, emphasizes female stereotypes, etc. While the Forum, also describes many successful women, their spirit, their .efforts, their careers. In other words, the overall feeling is building a positive image of women. If the site is sexy pictures, nude pictures, or more beautiful women's erotic story that I think that is another matter. But in fact, is not .. So, I think we should be tolerant attitude to this matter. At the same time also inclusive "beauty economy" indecent. 2. whether there is "beauty economy? this reference itself is a gimmick or really anything? party just & # 65306 .; beauty economy does exist. It is typically used to refer to consumer women and beauty, the female as a consumer, a subordinate objects. For example, shows the female nude, showing women sexy features, etc. This is discrimination against women. But .I think this forum, although the term is also used, however, establish a positive image of women. Local government officials want to find a selling local "selling points" to meet the current "," meet the immediate economic "beauty", which .although feel uncomfortable, however, my personal forum based on the overall style, still think this initiative of the local government. <wbr> <wbr> <wbr> 3, Shanxi Xinzhou Government website posts, on "beauty economy today received a letter from .the newspaper reporters, after sticking to reply. Reporter: online today such a script: the official website for beauty Forum officials justify use of beautiful women to economic development. See gender culture after feeling with a great relationship, but also the lack of precise knowledge ., therefore, to ask you again. Issue: 1, so-called "beauty economy", the essence of what is feminine when?, consumer goods, or a concept we confined to traditional, temporarily unable to accept new ideas, new approaches? .party just: beauty economy appeared inappropriate wording, but also very offensive to the public, particularly to the feminist perspective, is the reference to the consumer, the female is not good. However, I feel that a transaction should not simply look at its name ., but should look at its essence. I read the article in the Forum, see no female "consumption". The so-called "consumption" which should mean specifically directed at female beauty and physical characteristics, emphasizes female stereotypes, etc. While the .Forum, also describes many successful women, their spirit, their efforts, their careers. In other words, the overall feeling is building a positive image of women. If the site is sexy pictures, nude pictures, or more beautiful women's erotic story that I .think that is another matter. But in fact, is not. So, I think we should be tolerant attitude to this matter. At the same time also inclusive "beauty economy" indecent. 2. whether there is "beauty economy? this reference itself .is a gimmick or really anything? party just: beauty economy does exist. It is typically used to refer to consumer women and beauty, the female as a consumer, a subordinate objects. For example, shows the female nude, showing women sexy features, .etc. This is discrimination against women. But I think this forum, although the term is also used, however, establish a positive image of women. Local government officials want to find a selling local "selling points" to meet the current initiatives of the ."two" is simply playing cards and elected the Shanxi diaochan Xinzhou tourism the two presenters, and did not see anything unique. Especially the latter, everywhere. Such a "beauty economy", really in social ethics, economic development, law, tradition and .so well balanced? how would you rate this kind of "beauty economy" beauty economy ", although feel uncomfortable, however, my personal forum based on the overall style, still think this initiative of the local government. 3, Shanxi Xinzhou Government website posts ., "beauty" of two initiatives in the economy is simply playing diao Chan brand and elected Shanxi Xinzhou tourism the two presenters, and did not see anything unique. Especially the latter, everywhere. Such a "beauty economy", really in social ethics, .economic development, law, tradition and so well balanced? how would you rate this economic "beauty?": Vincent Fang is well balanced in every respect, and not very important. As long as no violation of the law. As long as not too .challenging sense of ethics and the public. At present, such initiatives did not break the law, did not challenge the mainstream of ethics and values. 4, in the Forum post, no lack of "beauty is productivity," "famous dead man can .stand up to make money on what you do, what to pack, how to develop, "" beauty is irresistible allure, glamour's charming, beautiful hometown will create and develop a more splendid "in this statement, how do you judge? especially the" .beauty is the productivity "! party just to hear such words alone:, I feel really bad mood. However, I think it is necessary to comprehensively objectively. For example," beauty is productivity, "if we say that beauty sexy, the body .is productivity is, of course, the we oppose. However, from the overall style of the Forum, or emphasize beauty appeal, appeal, and not a consumer object. So, I think it should be inclusive and tolerant. Local officials, no gender .awareness education, lack of feminist spirit, is understandable. As long as their behaviour is not really an insult and injury in women, and should not be simply because a negative word. 5, can be seen from these posts, it was "beautiful economy ."and" beauty economy "concept confusion, through the" beautiful economy "(such as plastic, cosmetic, etc), try? party just: does in every respect to balance, not too important. As long as no violation of the law. .As long as not too challenging sense of ethics and the public. At present, such initiatives did not break the law, did not challenge the mainstream of ethics and values. Beauty economy ", although feel uncomfortable, however, my personal forum based on the .overall style, still think this initiative of the local government. 3, Shanxi Xinzhou Government website posts, "beauty" of two initiatives in the economy is simply playing diao Chan brand and elected Shanxi Xinzhou tourism the two presenters, and did not see anything unique .. Especially the latter, everywhere. Such a "beauty economy", really in social ethics, economic development, law, tradition and so well balanced? how would you rate this economic "beauty?": Vincent Fang is well balanced in every respect, .and not very important. As long as no violation of the law. As long as not too challenging sense of ethics and the public. At present, such initiatives did not break the law, did not challenge the mainstream of ethics and values. 4, .in the Forum post, no lack of "beauty is productivity," "famous dead man can stand up to make money on what you do, what to pack, how to develop," "beauty is irresistible allure, glamour's charming, beautiful hometown will .create and develop a more splendid "in this statement, how do you judge? especially the" beauty is the productivity "! party just to hear such words alone:, feel really bad mood. However, I think it is necessary to comprehensively objectively. .For example, "beauty is productivity," if we say that beauty sexy, the body is productivity is, of course, the we oppose. However, from the overall style of the Forum, or emphasize beauty appeal, appeal, and not a consumer .object. So, I think it should be inclusive and tolerant. Local officials, no gender awareness education, lack of feminist spirit, is understandable. As long as their behaviour is not really an insult and injury in women, and should not be simply because .a negative word. 5, can be seen from these posts, it was "beautiful economy" and "beauty economy" concept confusion, through the "beautiful economy" (such as plastic, cosmetic, etc.) <wbr> rationality, try < .wbr> <wbr> 4 beauty economy ", although feel uncomfortable, however, my personal forum based on the overall style, still think this initiative of the local government. 3, Shanxi Xinzhou Government website posts," beauty "of two initiatives in the .economy is simply playing diao Chan brand and elected Shanxi Xinzhou tourism the two presenters, and did not see anything unique. Especially the latter, everywhere. Such a "beauty economy", really in social ethics, economic development, law, tradition and so well .balanced? how would you rate this economic "beauty?": Vincent Fang is well balanced in every respect, and not very important. As long as no violation of the law. As long as not too challenging sense of ethics and the public. At .present, such initiatives did not break the law, did not challenge the mainstream of ethics and values. 4, in the Forum post, no lack of "beauty is productivity," "famous dead man can stand up to make money on what you do ., what to pack, how to develop, "" beauty is irresistible allure, glamour's charming, beautiful hometown will create and develop a more splendid "in this statement, how do you judge? especially the" beauty is the productivity "! party just & .# 65306; simply listening to the case, I feel really bad mood. However, I think it is necessary to comprehensively objectively. For example, "beauty is productivity," if we say that beauty sexy, the body is productivity is, of course ., the we oppose. However, from the overall style of the Forum, or emphasize beauty appeal, appeal, and not a consumer object. So, I think it should be inclusive and tolerant. Local officials, no gender awareness education, lack of feminist .spirit, is understandable. As long as their behaviour is not really an insult and injury in women, and should not be simply because a negative word. 5, can be seen from these posts, it was "beautiful economy" and "beauty economy" .concept confusion, through the "beautiful economy" (such as plastic, cosmetic, etc.), discussion, forum post, no lack of "beauty is the productivity of this letter, newspaper reporters received shortly after sticking to it. Reporter: online today .such a script: the official website for beauty Forum officials justify use of beautiful women to economic development. See gender culture after feeling with a great relationship, but also the lack of precise knowledge, therefore, to ask you again. Issue: 1, so .-called "beauty economy", the essence of what is feminine when?, consumer goods, or a concept we confined to traditional, temporarily unable to accept new ideas, new approaches? party just: beauty economy appeared inappropriate wording, but also very offensive .to the public, particularly to the feminist perspective, is the reference to the consumer, the female is not good. However, I feel that a transaction should not simply look at its name, but should look at its essence. I read the article in .the Forum, see no female "consumption". The so-called "consumption" which should mean specifically directed at female beauty and physical characteristics, emphasizes female stereotypes, etc. While the Forum, also describes many successful women, their spirit, their efforts ., their careers. In other words, the overall feeling is building a positive image of women. If the site is sexy pictures, nude pictures, or more beautiful women's erotic story that I think that is another matter. But in fact, is not. .So, I think we should be tolerant attitude to this matter. At the same time also inclusive "beauty economy" indecent. 2. whether there is "beauty economy? this reference itself is a gimmick or really anything? party just: beauty economy does .exist. It is typically used to refer to consumer women and beauty, the female as a consumer, a subordinate objects. For example, shows the female nude, showing women sexy features, etc. This is discrimination against women. But I think this forum ., although the term is also used, however, establish a positive image of women. Local government officials want to find a selling local "selling points" to meet the current "," "famous dead man can stand up to make money on what you .do, what to pack, how to develop ", beauty economy", although feel uncomfortable, however, my personal forum based on the overall style, still think this initiative of the local government. 3, Shanxi Xinzhou Government website posts, "beauty" .of two initiatives in the economy is simply playing diao Chan brand and elected Shanxi Xinzhou tourism the two presenters, and did not see anything unique. Especially the latter, everywhere. Such a "beauty economy", really in social ethics, economic development, law ., tradition and so well balanced? how would you rate this economic "beauty?": Vincent Fang is well balanced in every respect, and not very important. As long as no violation of the law. As long as not too challenging sense of ethics .and the public. At present, such initiatives did not break the law, did not challenge the mainstream of ethics and values. 4, in the Forum post, no lack of "beauty is productivity," "famous dead man can stand up to make .money on what you do, what to pack, how to develop, "" beauty is irresistible allure, glamour's charming, beautiful hometown will create and develop a more splendid "in this statement, how do you judge? especially the" beauty is the productivity ."! party just to hear such words alone:, feel really bad mood. However, I acknowledgeIn order to complete an objective way. For example," beauty is productivity, "if we say that beauty sexy, the body is productivity is, of .course, the we oppose. However, from the overall style of the Forum, or emphasize beauty appeal, appeal, and not a consumer object. So, I think it should be inclusive and tolerant. Local officials, no gender awareness education, lack of .feminist spirit, is understandable. As long as their behaviour is not really an insult and injury in women, and should not be simply because a negative word. 5, can be seen from these posts, it was "beautiful economy" and "beauty economy ."concept confusion, through the" beautiful economy "(such as plastic, cosmetic, etc), try the" beauty is irresistible allure, glamour's charming, beautiful hometown will create and develop a more splendid "in this statement, how do you judge? .especially the "beauty is the productivity beauty economy", although feel uncomfortable, however, my personal forum based on the overall style, still think this initiative of the local government. 3, Shanxi Xinzhou Government website posts, "beauty" of two initiatives in .the economy is simply playing diao Chan brand and elected Shanxi Xinzhou tourism the two presenters, and did not see anything unique. Especially the latter, everywhere. Such a "beauty economy", really in social ethics, economic development, law, tradition and so .well balanced? how would you rate this economic "beauty?": Vincent Fang is well balanced in every respect, and not very important. As long as no violation of the law. As long as not too challenging sense of ethics and the public. .At present, such initiatives did not break the law, did not challenge the mainstream of ethics and values. 4, in the Forum post, no lack of "beauty is productivity," "famous dead man can stand up to make money on what you .do, what to pack, how to develop, "" beauty is irresistible allure, glamour's charming, beautiful hometown will create and develop a more splendid "in this statement, how do you judge? especially the" beauty is the productivity "! party just .to hear such words alone:, feel really bad mood. However, I think it is necessary to comprehensively objectively. For example, "beauty is productivity," if we say that beauty sexy, the body is productivity is, of course, the we .oppose. However, from the overall style of the Forum, or emphasize beauty appeal, appeal, and not a consumer object. So, I think it should be inclusive and tolerant. Local officials, no gender awareness education, lack of feminist spirit, is .understandable. As long as their behaviour is not really an insult and injury in women, and should not be simply because a negative word. 5, can be seen from these posts, it was "beautiful economy" and "beauty economy" concept confusion, .through the "beautiful economy" (such as plastic, cosmetic, etc), try "! figure derived from the" Belle economic rationality. "This logic, how do you judge? party just: I think that from a feminist perspective, plastic surgery ., cosmetic beauty of the "economic", "with the consumption of female beauty economy", essentially the same, are women as ornamental objects. However, as ornamental objects are not necessarily bad, man can become the object of women to watch, in .reality this phenomenon already exists. Importantly, viewing, in either the "beauty" or "handsome" for signs marketing place, provided that they do not stigmatize female or male, it is not a big mistake. Like this website, the introduction of contemporary .beauty, mainly from the angle of their success, I feel very good. 6, the so-called beauty economy, whether there is discrimination, women face discrimination. Party just: may exist but do not necessarily exist. Not because the reference to " .beauty "is considered to be discriminatory, but rather to look at how to deal with" Belle, "how to use the" Belle ". Forum link address http:www.sxxz.gov.cntempletlist_xz.php?id=159 party just to .hear such words alone:, feel really bad mood. However, I think it is necessary to comprehensively objectively. For example, "beauty is the productivity figure derived from the" Belle economic rationality. "This logic, how you can comment onSentenced?: .I think the party just from a feminist perspective, plastic surgery, cosmetic beauty of the "economic", "with the consumption of female beauty economy", essentially the same, are women as ornamental objects. However, as ornamental objects are not necessarily bad ., man can become the object of women to watch, in reality this phenomenon already exists. Importantly, viewing, in either the "beauty" or "handsome" for signs marketing place, provided that they do not stigmatize female or male, it is not .a big mistake. Like this website, the introduction of contemporary beauty, mainly from the angle of their success, I feel very good. 6, the so-called beauty economy, whether there is discrimination, women face discrimination. Party just: may exist .but do not necessarily exist. Not because the reference to "beauty" is considered to be discriminatory, but rather to look at how to deal with "Belle," how to use the "Belle". Forum link address http:www.sxxz..